Should 8 votes be required to pass a rule change?
Here is the current rule:
The league has always been run with the understanding that a tie means we don't have a majority so the rule doesn't change. The rule doesn't read that way. If there is a tie my vote is supposed to count as 2 and if I'm in favor of a change the rule passes. I don't like the way this is worded and it should be changed to reflect the way the league has been run.Voting, Rule Changes, and Disputes
Rule changes can be proposed by owners during the off-season. For a rule change to pass it must receive a majority of votes from the owners in the league, but rule changes that specifically remove one of the league’s basic foundations are not allowed. This league will always be a dynasty, contract, and salary cap league. Modifications may be made, but owners cannot vote to eliminate those basic characteristics from the league. In cases of a tie when voting the commissioner’s vote counts as two votes to break the tie.