Thats not what this commission found ergo, that is not what this post is about. If anything it suggested that these recent oversight attempts were misguided at best.
I thought we addressed my alternative options in the last thread. But to have any alternative in any situation, one needs to believe a rampant problem existed in the first place. In the case of evaluation, which was a small portion of this study, i don't believe there was a rampant preexisting problem that required a complete overhaul.
Agree with Payton. There is where i feel the problem of traditional teacher evals had its faults. I even shared my own experiences of reporting evidence of poor teachers to admin while the teacher was more easily fireable (or fixable) only to be ignored and the poor teacher was permitted to continue through the system.



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks