Unconstitutional President - The Sequel to George Bush...Obama, Bush II, The Tyranny.

[Marley]

The Founders didn't want foreign influence once the country was underway. The Constitution's INTENT is clear you IDIOTS.

1. The Constitution is a living document, not a step-by-step guide.

2. This isn't the late 1700s, the country you long for is gone.

[thelittlecheese]

1. The Constitution is a living document, not a step-by-step guide.

2. This isn't the late 1700s, the country you long for is gone.

The most important rules and lessons in history which were put in the Constitution need to be applied to today. It is NOT an archaic document which is wholly inapplicable today. The original INTENT is what is critical. The Constitution CLEARLY was written with the intent not to let other countries' leaders influence our affairs. There are all kinds of clear intentions put in the Constitution and it's up to our leaders to make sure they craft our laws as closely to those principles as possible or we will be torn apart by those leftists who meddle and rip apart this Republic. This government is CLEARLY too big. It's not even a question in my mind. This govt has FAR exceeded the intentions of what the founders described as "tyranny". If alive today, the founders would say we clearly have gotten FAR FAR FARRRRRRRRRR away from the original intent.

[Superbelt]

Laws like ceding our Assets to an impartial arbiter, to be paid to the British Crown.

Or paying tribute to Barbary pirates so they wouldn't attack our ships.

[thelittlecheese]

Laws like ceding our Assets to an impartial arbiter, to be paid to the British Crown.

Or paying tribute to Barbary pirates so they wouldn't attack our ships.

Gotta love the avoidance of the whole point. But then again, that's what I expect.

[Superbelt]

Gotta love the avoidance of the whole point. But then again, that's what I expect.

How am I avoiding the whole point. I pointed out two specific examples of something you say the founders never intended to be Constitutional.

That was ultimately in response to you saying this

The DIRECT INTENT of our founders who wrote the Constitution was to FORBID external influence of our nation by foreign leaders. THAT WAS THE WHOLE POINT YOU F'ING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! God you obviously have no sense, NONE!

I show where the founders do that, several times.

You ignore it.

[thelittlecheese]

How am I avoiding the whole point. I pointed out two specific examples of something you say the founders never intended to be Constitutional.

That was ultimately in response to you saying this

I show where the founders do that, several times.

You ignore it.

Intent and true action are different things. We'd all like to have a perfect world but certain realities squash that. Ok, what you're saying is that because certain realities forced them to act against their intent, what I'm saying is that their intent was still to prevent foreign servitude to external powers. The founders had different challenges because their external forces were true THREATS to them while the external forces I'm talking about today WERE INVITED IN. There is a big difference.

[ThankGod4Walsh]

I love the "that ship has sailed" comments.

The Constitution is a "living document" but we can't undo the stupid things we've tacked onto it, but we can absolutely tack on more stupid things to it.