To take some single factoid and use that as singular proof to promote your premise is at least partly why you deserve crap, Walsh
So the factoid that the British spent a large part of their efforts in the North Atlantic is proof that US participation wasn't needed?
And then you get angry when your flip comment is criticized as proof because it's basically wrong and it wasn't the RAF but the combined efforts of the RAF, the Royal Navy, the Canadians AND the United States to win in the North Atlantic?Hitler's U-Boats got trashed by the RAF in the Atlantic.
Or the well-known factoid that Germany was always dealing with oil shortages is proof alone that US participation wasn't needed and a Nazi collapse was inevitable? poppycock.
Forget that your statements about oil production from Rumania are wrong or the reasons for invading Russia are reduced to one variable.