Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 63 of 63
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Hoboken NJ
    Posts
    49,356
    Quote Originally Posted by Predicto View Post
    FYI - the Mercer index is not really a "quality of life" gauge. It does not puport to measure many of the things that most people consider in such surveys - things like culture, food, weather, things to do, history, natural beauty, proximity to other things of interest, neighborhoods, etc. It isn't about any of those things.

    The Mercer index is used solely to evaluate how much "hazard pay" you have to pay to an executive to relocate somewhere. Pretty much the only thing it cares about is infrastructure, crime, ease of getting in and out on airplanes, and traffic. On that scale, Zurich is the perfect city. Safe, white, clean, new and dull as dishwater.

    If you want to see an index of quality of life in the sense that most of us understand it, the best source is probably the Conde Nast or Travel and Leisure magazine surveys. On those surveys of tens of thousands of travellers the favorite city usually is Sydney, Australia, followed by San Francisco.

    Of course, if you take into account cost of living, the lists will change dramatically again. San Francisco would drop because it is so expensive. But the Mercer iindex doesn't care about that either - cost of living is meaningless to a high powered international business executive.

    Basically, the Mercer index is useless.
    This makes sense.
    Teachers are scumbags, what else is new? - Raider Bill

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts
    Posts
    35,351
    This is pretty interesting about the Mercer, although the cities on the list do seem attractive places to live.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    39,523
    Quote Originally Posted by Predicto View Post
    FYI - the Mercer index is not really a "quality of life" gauge. It does not puport to measure many of the things that most people consider in such surveys - things like culture, food, weather, things to do, history, natural beauty, proximity to other things of interest, neighborhoods, etc. It isn't about any of those things.

    The Mercer index is used solely to evaluate how much "hazard pay" you have to pay to an executive to relocate somewhere. Pretty much the only thing it cares about is infrastructure, crime, ease of getting in and out on airplanes, and traffic. On that scale, Zurich is the perfect city. Safe, white, clean, new and dull as dishwater.

    If you want to see an index of quality of life in the sense that most of us understand it, the best source is probably the Conde Nast or Travel and Leisure magazine surveys. On those surveys of tens of thousands of travellers the favorite city usually is Sydney, Australia, followed by San Francisco.

    Of course, if you take into account cost of living, the lists will change dramatically again. San Francisco would drop because it is so expensive. But the Mercer iindex doesn't care about that either - cost of living is meaningless to a high powered international business executive.

    Basically, the Mercer index is useless.
    Ah, that explains why Ottawa and Canberra are on the list.
    "the blade itself incites to violence." - Homer

    --

    "There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - Kung fu Monkey

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  






Fantasy Football Rankings


Part of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.