Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Lyon , France
    Posts
    5,546

    Redskins used Mara to motivate

    http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post...ra-to-motivate

    LANDOVER, Md. -- As the "Monday Night Football" game between the Washington Redskins and the New York Giants gets set to begin here, our man Adam Schefter as an interesting story about a motivational tactic the Redskins' coaches are trying to use. Apparently, they have been playing up quotes from Giants owner John Mara from back in March about the salary-cap penalties that took a total of $36 million in cap space from the Redskins and $10 million from the Dallas Cowboys over two years for the way they spent money during the uncapped 2010 season:
    Mara, the chairman of the NFL's management committee, was among those who led the charge to take away $36 million worth of salary-cap space from the Redskins this past offseason.

    In an article that was posted on ESPN.com on March 25, Mara was quoted as saying, "I think (the Redskins) are lucky they didn't lose draft picks" and "I thought the penalties imposed were proper."

    In the days leading up to the Giants-Redskins game on "Monday Night Football," Washington coaches and officials had Mara's quotes hanging on sheets of paper on their office doors, according to team sources.

    Based on the quotes, the Redskins are convinced that Mara tried to have enough draft picks taken away so that Washington couldn't complete its deal with St. Louis for the rights to select quarterback Robert Griffin III.

    I know Mike Shanahan and Redskins management feel as though they were done wrong by Mara and the league on this issue. They didn't like that it was Mara, who owns a team that plays in the same division as the Redskins and Cowboys, who pushed for the penalties. They didn't like that he was so vocal in his defense of them. And they didn't like that the penalties were imposed without warning less than 24 hours before free agency started. They're bitter and angry, still, even though their appeals were denied and they've had to make plans for next year with $18 million less in salary cap room than they expected to have.

    But I question this as a motivational tactic for the actual players. This is a dispute between the front offices, and it has little if anything to with the players who are on the Redskins' roster. If anything, additional salary-cap space this past offseason would have enabled the Redskins to bring in players that would have blocked one or more of their current players from the jobs they currently have. If I were a player, I'm not sure I'd be all that upset that my team was prevented by outside forces from bringing in better players. I might even take such an idea as an insult.

    So we'll see, but even if the Redskins win this game tonight I don't expect to go into the locker room afterward and hear a lot of talk about how the salary cap penalties motivated them to beat the Giants. Got to believe the chance to move within a game of first place with four games to go is motivation enough.
    "If it ain't broke don't fix it" @ Daniel Snyder

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    808 state
    Posts
    43,130
    I always thought the whole 'motivated' talk that happens in these scenarios was just fluff. Once the players hit the field, they aren't thinking about what Mara said/did.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mount Airy, MD
    Posts
    31,791
    Yeah I agree with Blaze. But if they used it to motivate the coaches, which it appears they did, then I'm cool with it. I was thinking about this during the first Giants game but forgot all about it last night. Now that I'm reminded it was a nice little bonus to wake up to.

    Mara was a vindictive little prick who was motivated by screwing division rivals. The timing of the penalties was an unnecessary trist of the knife and a punk ass move.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    16,107
    Quote Originally Posted by Davekn View Post
    Mara was a vindictive little prick who was motivated by screwing division rivals. The timing of the penalties was an unnecessary trist of the knife and a punk ass move.
    Quit being miserable Dave.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Manassas, in the Old Dominion
    Posts
    16,770
    I disagree with the author's notion that Redskins players don't care. They saw London Fletcher have to waffle in his contract negotiations, and they KNOW why. They know there were better players out there that we could have pursued, but did not, because of Mara. And they know Rak, etc. will be hard pressed to get good money in this upcoming FA because of Mara from this team...and if he thinks that does not affect them, then he is just being obtuse.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  






Part of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.