Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 124
  1. 04-09-2012, 03:25 PM #31
    Bigwill's Avatar
    Bigwill
    Bigwill is offline Square Peg
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Woodstock, IL
    Posts
    6,954
    I could live with Mercilus and Jeffrey. I'm not a huge fan of either, but they're certainly positions of need.

    And Jeffrey in the second is good value, to boot.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-10-2012, 08:41 PM #32
    DaSuperfan's Avatar
    DaSuperfan
    DaSuperfan is offline Never Die Easy
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    16,453
    Let's make a pick for Denver and get this Mock Draft rolling again.

    karhu, I'm fine with giving Denver a RB, although I can't speak for everyone else.
    "Nationalism is power hunger tempered by self-deception." - George Orwell
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 04-10-2012, 08:45 PM #33
    Buffaloaf
    Buffaloaf is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockford, IL
    Posts
    1,052
    RB seems appropriate.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 04-10-2012, 08:48 PM #34
    thunderspirit's Avatar
    thunderspirit
    thunderspirit is offline unofficial threadkiller
    Send a message via ICQ to thunderspirit
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Richmond, IL *sigh*
    Posts
    6,454
    i'm fine with it.
    Your Chicago Bears: still learning about this newfangled thing called the "forward pass."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 04-10-2012, 08:58 PM #35
    karhu
    karhu is offline Forward in all directions
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    I'M A JEALOUS WEEDHEAD NINJA TURTLE WHO LIVES IN THE SEWER
    Posts
    18,881
    Doug Martin or David Wilson, then? I'd lean toward Wilson: speed kills, especially when you're used to thin air and your opponent isn't.
    That the world is explicable is miraculous, and so explanations need not be the undoing of miracles.

    After you talk about the hole in her nipple, where do you go with it? You’ve got nothing.

    We need models. They're beautiful, they're rich, they travel lots, you don't have to spend that much time with them. Those f-ers that date models, they got it made. My next girlfriend's gonna be a six-foot-tall model. Definitely. Big one. I like those chicks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 04-10-2012, 09:04 PM #36
    thunderspirit's Avatar
    thunderspirit
    thunderspirit is offline unofficial threadkiller
    Send a message via ICQ to thunderspirit
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Richmond, IL *sigh*
    Posts
    6,454
    Wilson probably is a better complement to McGahee.
    Your Chicago Bears: still learning about this newfangled thing called the "forward pass."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 04-11-2012, 02:07 AM #37
    The Kaiser's Avatar
    The Kaiser
    The Kaiser is offline And LikeThat-pff-He'sGone
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Other side of the world...seriously
    Posts
    3,069
    Wow. Doug Martin fell into round 3. That looks like a steal there.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 04-11-2012, 03:27 AM #38
    BearsFanInMN's Avatar
    BearsFanInMN
    BearsFanInMN is offline The Hip-Hop-Opotamus
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rosemount, MN
    Posts
    5,798
    Quote Originally Posted by The Kaiser View Post
    Wow. Doug Martin fell into round 3. That looks like a steal there.
    Agree
    Basic, yes, but it was something we rarely saw under former Bears coordinator Ron Turner. Turner's idea of in-game adjustments involved his boxer shorts. -Rick Morrissey.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 04-11-2012, 07:06 PM #39
    DaSuperfan's Avatar
    DaSuperfan
    DaSuperfan is offline Never Die Easy
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    16,453
    Hey guys let's just make a pick for Tampa Bay, chariots said if he were to be late with a pick again to just skip or make a pick for him.
    "Nationalism is power hunger tempered by self-deception." - George Orwell
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 04-11-2012, 07:43 PM #40
    KFFLMockCommish
    KFFLMockCommish is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    667
    Sounds good, I'm at work so I can't really research team needs and help out though.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 04-11-2012, 07:57 PM #41
    karhu
    karhu is offline Forward in all directions
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    I'M A JEALOUS WEEDHEAD NINJA TURTLE WHO LIVES IN THE SEWER
    Posts
    18,881
    TB's got no safeties. George Iloka?
    That the world is explicable is miraculous, and so explanations need not be the undoing of miracles.

    After you talk about the hole in her nipple, where do you go with it? You’ve got nothing.

    We need models. They're beautiful, they're rich, they travel lots, you don't have to spend that much time with them. Those f-ers that date models, they got it made. My next girlfriend's gonna be a six-foot-tall model. Definitely. Big one. I like those chicks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 04-11-2012, 08:08 PM #42
    thunderspirit's Avatar
    thunderspirit
    thunderspirit is offline unofficial threadkiller
    Send a message via ICQ to thunderspirit
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Richmond, IL *sigh*
    Posts
    6,454
    they don't have a right tackle either, unless you think Jeremy Trueblood and/or Jamon Meredith is the future there. (which they're not.)
    Your Chicago Bears: still learning about this newfangled thing called the "forward pass."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 04-11-2012, 08:18 PM #43
    DaSuperfan's Avatar
    DaSuperfan
    DaSuperfan is offline Never Die Easy
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    16,453
    TB is also really thin at RB after Blount.

    After looking at TB's depth chart on offense, they're looking pretty stacked. OL looks terrific (with the exception of Trueblood at RT) with Nicks and Joseph as possibly the best duo of guards in the entire league. Obviously VJax gives them a boost at WR. If Freeman returns back to form from his 2010 performance, along with a healthy Blount, they could be a pretty dangerous offense. But they don't have much depth behind Blount and with the style of football he plays, he's not going to avoid a lot of contact.
    Last edited by DaSuperfan; 04-11-2012 at 08:55 PM.
    "Nationalism is power hunger tempered by self-deception." - George Orwell
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 04-11-2012, 08:55 PM #44
    thunderspirit's Avatar
    thunderspirit
    thunderspirit is offline unofficial threadkiller
    Send a message via ICQ to thunderspirit
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Richmond, IL *sigh*
    Posts
    6,454
    any ohter comments toward finding a consensus? i'd like to make KC's pick, but don't want to step on Tampa to do it.
    Your Chicago Bears: still learning about this newfangled thing called the "forward pass."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 04-12-2012, 03:04 PM #45
    green18's Avatar
    green18
    green18 is offline The Green B*stard
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    4,881
    I don't mean to stir the pot or step on anyone's toes here, but I'd rather have KFFLmockcommish just step in and make the pick(s) for the team(s) that got skipped.

    I'm probably alone on this, but IMO, it's better for the integrity of the draft as a whole and makes it more fair to the other teams. Not because a round-table discussion leading to a consensus pick is unfair or gets the pick wrong - on the contrary, you guys do a very nice job. I guess my 'issue', if there is one, is that throwing out names tends to get those names out there and acts as a reminder/prompt for the rest of the teams.

    I used to be in a fantasy football league that had a plain Jane snake-style redraft every year. And every year, about 1/3 of the way through, the same guy would start 'casually' chatting to the people next to him about players who hadn't been selected yet. "You mean nobody's taken Donovan McNabb yet???" etc. - knowing full well that McNabb hadn't been taken yet. And, of course, the guy mentioning McNabb had already taken his QB and had no intention of EVER taking him. And, sure enough, Donovan gets taken within the next 3 picks. (and leaving a RB for 'the guy' to take 2 picks after that.) Had nothing been said, Donovan might not have been picked for another round or two.

    Please understand, I'm not trying to insinuate that anything like that happens with our mock, even unintentionally. I don't think it's really a big deal, either way, to be honest. But, to avoid the possibility of anything like that happening, my preference would be for the commish to just make the pick without a discussion. Just my 2 cents.
    .
    ....................    None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you... you're locked in here with me. ........
    .......................    .
    ...................    .......................Best Green Bay quote ever: "We'll never forget you, Brent." .......
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules






Fantasy Football Rankings


Part of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.